Number of strokes required to displace cement calculation/ Petrosmartt

  

Directional Drilling Planning - Survey Calculations, Trajectory Design, and Anti-Collision Engineering

Directional drilling is the intentional deviation of a wellbore from vertical to reach a subsurface target that cannot be accessed from the surface location directly above it. Every directional well requires a planned trajectory - a mathematical description of the wellbore path through three-dimensional space from surface to target - and a continuous comparison of that plan against the actual surveyed position of the wellbore as it is drilled. The directional driller who manages this comparison is making steering decisions based on the survey stations reported every 30-90 ft. Each decision must account for not only whether the wellbore is on plan, but whether it is approaching any other wellbore in the field - an anti-collision failure in a dense development pattern can result in one wellbore intersecting another at depth, creating a blowout of the adjacent producing well that cannot be controlled from surface. This guide covers the complete engineering framework: how to design a directional trajectory, how to calculate survey positions using the minimum curvature method, and how to quantify the separation between adjacent wellbores for anti-collision safety.

1. Directional Well Trajectory Design

1.1 Well Profile Types

Profile Type	Description	Typical Application	Key Design Parameter
Build-and-hold (J-profile)	Build inclination from vertical to target angle, then hold that angle to target depth. Simplest directional profile.	Moderate offset targets. Step-out from platform.	Kickoff point (KOP) depth and build rate (°/100ft) determine the horizontal reach achievable.
Build-hold-drop (S-profile)	Build inclination, hold at angle through reservoir, then drop back toward vertical above target. Useful when casing setting depth requires vertical re-entry.	Cluster wells needing vertical production string. Subsea wells with limited wellhead spacing.	Drop rate and drop start depth must be planned to achieve near-vertical approach to target.
Horizontal well (build-to-90°)	Build inclination from vertical to 90° (horizontal), then hold horizontal through reservoir pay zone. Standard for unconventional development.	Tight oil, shale gas, horizontal drain wells.	Build rate determines the distance from KOP to horizontal entry - affects reservoir depth of entry. High build rate (DLS 10°/100ft) → short radius, earlier entry.
Extended Reach Drilling (ERD)	Wellbore drilled to very large measured depth relative to TVD. Departure/TVD ratio >2:1. Accesses reservoirs far from the drill site.	Offshore platform wells reaching distant reservoir areas. Subsea wells.	Torque and drag become the limiting factors. String weight management critical for ERD.

1.2 Trajectory Design - Build Rate and KOP Selection

Build-and-hold trajectory geometry (J-profile):

Given: Target TVD = 9,500 ft, Target horizontal departure = 3,200 ft
Required: KOP depth, build rate, hold inclination

Step 1 - Calculate required inclination at target:
tan(inclination) = Horizontal departure / TVD below KOP

Trial: KOP at 3,000 ft TVD. TVD below KOP to target = 9,500 - 3,000 = 6,500 ft
tan(I) = 3,200 / 6,500 = 0.4923 → I = arctan(0.4923) = 26.2° hold inclination

Step 2 - Calculate build distance required:
Build length (MD, ft) = (Inclination / Build_rate) x 100
For build rate = 2°/100 ft: Build length = (26.2 / 2) x 100 = 1,310 ft MD

Step 3 - Check TVD consumed during build:
TVD_build = (R x sin(I)) where R = 18,000/DLS (radius of curvature in ft)
R = 18,000 / 2 = 9,000 ft radius
TVD_build = R x (1 - cos(I)) = 9,000 x (1 - cos(26.2°)) = 9,000 x (1 - 0.8973) = 9,000 x 0.1027 = 924 ft TVD consumed in build

Step 4 - Verify departure during build:
Horizontal departure in build = R x sin(I) = 9,000 x sin(26.2°) = 9,000 x 0.4415 = 3,973 ft departure during build alone

Wait - departure during build (3,973 ft) already exceeds target departure (3,200 ft). Build rate of 2°/100ft with KOP at 3,000 ft reaches too far. Redesign:

Use build rate = 3°/100ft: R = 18,000/3 = 6,000 ft
Departure in build = 6,000 x sin(26.2°) = 6,000 x 0.4415 = 2,649 ft
Remaining departure in hold = 3,200 - 2,649 = 551 ft
Hold length (MD) = 551 / sin(26.2°) = 551 / 0.4415 = 1,248 ft in hold section

Final trajectory: KOP at 3,000 ft, build at 3°/100ft to 26.2°, hold to TD. Total MD ≈ 10,200 ft.

2. Survey Calculation - Minimum Curvature Method

2.1 Why Survey Calculation Matters

A directional survey gives inclination (I) and azimuth (A) at each survey station depth. The survey calculation converts these angle measurements into changes in North, East, and TVD - the three coordinates that define the wellbore position in three-dimensional space. The minimum curvature method is the industry standard because it assumes the wellbore follows the smoothest possible arc between survey stations, which is the most physically realistic assumption:

Minimum Curvature Method - converting surveys to 3D position:

Between survey station 1 (I1, A1) and station 2 (I2, A2), separated by course length ΔMD:

Dog Leg Angle (beta):
cos(beta) = cos(I2-I1) - sin(I1) x sin(I2) x (1 - cos(A2-A1))

Ratio factor (RF):
RF = 2/beta x tan(beta/2) (in radians)
If beta = 0: RF = 1

Position changes:
delta_TVD = (ΔMD/2) x (cos(I1) + cos(I2)) x RF
delta_North = (ΔMD/2) x (sin(I1)cos(A1) + sin(I2)cos(A2)) x RF
delta_East = (ΔMD/2) x (sin(I1)sin(A1) + sin(I2)sin(A2)) x RF

Worked example:
Survey 1: MD = 3,500 ft, I1 = 0°, A1 = 045° (NE)
Survey 2: MD = 3,600 ft, I2 = 3°, A2 = 045°
ΔMD = 100 ft

cos(beta) = cos(3-0) - sin(0) x sin(3) x (1-cos(0)) = cos(3°) - 0 = 0.9986
beta = arccos(0.9986) = 3.00° = 0.05236 radians
RF = 2/0.05236 x tan(0.02618) = 38.197 x 0.02620 = 1.0003 ≈ 1.0

delta_TVD = (100/2) x (cos(0°) + cos(3°)) x 1.0 = 50 x (1.000 + 0.9986) = 50 x 1.9986 = 99.93 ft TVD
delta_North = (100/2) x (sin(0°)cos(45°) + sin(3°)cos(45°)) x 1.0 = 50 x (0 + 0.0523 x 0.7071) = 50 x 0.0370 = 1.85 ft North
delta_East = (100/2) x (0 + sin(3°)sin(45°)) = 50 x (0.0523 x 0.7071) = 1.85 ft East

2.2 Dogleg Severity - The Key Survey Quality Indicator

Dogleg Severity (DLS) in degrees per 100 ft:
DLS = (beta / ΔMD) x 100

From the example above: DLS = (3.00° / 100 ft) x 100 = 3.0°/100 ft

This matches the planned build rate of 3°/100 ft → on plan.

Maximum acceptable DLS by casing section:
Conductor/surface: ≤1-2°/100 ft (large pipe, high bending stress sensitivity)
Intermediate casing: ≤3-4°/100 ft
Production casing: ≤3-5°/100 ft (standard)
Horizontal lateral (drill pipe only): up to 8-12°/100 ft (short-radius horizontal wells)

Bending stress in drill string at DLS (psi):
sigma_bending = 218,000 x OD x DLS / 100

For 5" drill pipe (OD = 5.0") at DLS = 6°/100 ft:
sigma_bending = 218,000 x 5.0 x 6.0 / 100 = 218,000 x 0.30 = 65,400 psi bending stress

For S-135 drill pipe (Yp = 135,000 psi): SF = 135,000/65,400 = 2.07 → Acceptable but not generous.
At DLS = 10°/100 ft: sigma_bending = 109,000 psi → SF = 1.24 → Fatigue failure risk with repeated cycling.

3. Anti-Collision Engineering

3.1 Why Anti-Collision Is Critical

In multi-well offshore platforms and pad drilling operations, multiple wellbores originate from closely spaced surface locations and diverge as they progress to their respective subsurface targets. Survey measurement errors in any wellbore mean that the actual wellbore position is not exactly where the survey calculations indicate - it lies within an uncertainty ellipsoid around the calculated position. Anti-collision analysis ensures that the uncertainty ellipsoids of adjacent wellbores do not overlap at any point along their trajectories:

Separation Factor (SF) - the anti-collision metric:
SF = (Center-to-center distance) / (Sum of ellipsoid radii in the separation direction)

SF > 1.5: Safe - wellbores are well separated considering survey uncertainty
SF 1.0-1.5: Warning - approaching limit. Review trajectory, consider survey upgrades.
SF < 1.0: COLLISION RISK - wellbore positions overlap within survey uncertainty. STOP drilling until redesigned.

Calculating center-to-center distance between two wellbores at a given depth:
Well A position: (TVD_A, North_A, East_A)
Well B position: (TVD_B, North_B, East_B)

3D distance = sqrt((TVD_A - TVD_B)^2 + (North_A - North_B)^2 + (East_A - East_B)^2)

Example: At 8,500 ft MD, scanning along reference well:
Well A (being drilled): N = 1,450 ft, E = 820 ft, TVD = 7,980 ft
Well B (adjacent producer): N = 1,380 ft, E = 790 ft, TVD = 8,010 ft

Distance = sqrt((7,980-8,010)^2 + (1,450-1,380)^2 + (820-790)^2)
= sqrt((-30)^2 + (70)^2 + (30)^2)
= sqrt(900 + 4,900 + 900) = sqrt(6,700) = 81.9 ft center-to-center separation

If combined uncertainty ellipsoid radius = 45 ft at this depth (from ISCWSA error model):
SF = 81.9 / (45 + 45) = 81.9 / 90 = SF = 0.91 → COLLISION RISK

Action: Stop drilling Well A. Review survey data. Consider running gyroscopic survey to reduce uncertainty. Redesign Well A trajectory to increase separation before resuming.

3.2 Survey Instrument Selection and Its Effect on Uncertainty

Survey Instrument	Inclination Accuracy	Azimuth Accuracy	Ellipsoid Radius at 10,000 ft	When Required
Magnetic MWD (standard)	±0.1°	±1.5°	±40-60 ft	Standard wells with adequate separation. Cannot be used near casing strings (magnetic interference).
Magnetic MWD with IFR correction	±0.1°	±0.5°	±20-35 ft	In-Field Referencing corrects for local magnetic anomalies. Reduces azimuth uncertainty by 60-70%.
Gyroscopic survey (continuous)	±0.05°	±0.1-0.3°	±8-20 ft	Dense cluster wells where SF <1.5 with magnetic MWD. Mandatory when drilling near existing casings. Used in relief well drilling.
SAGD well pair gyro	±0.02°	±0.05°	±3-8 ft	Required for SAGD wells where injection and production wells must be placed within 5 m of each other at all points along 1,000+ m horizontal.

4. Torque and Drag - The ERD Constraint

4.1 Soft String Torque and Drag Model

As wellbore inclination and azimuth change, the drill string contacts the wellbore wall and experiences friction forces. These forces reduce the weight available at the bit (WOB) and create torque that must be overcome at surface. In extended reach wells, torque and drag can become the binding constraint on how far the well can be drilled:

Normal force at a curved section (contact force between string and wellbore, lbs/ft):
Fn = sqrt((w_buoyed x sin(I))^2 + (T x DLS x pi/180/100)^2)

Where:
w_buoyed = buoyed weight of drill string per foot (lbs/ft)
T = axial tension at that point (lbs)
DLS = dogleg severity (°/100 ft)
I = inclination at that point

Friction force at that point:
Ff = mu x Fn (lbs/ft, where mu = friction factor, typically 0.15-0.35 for WBM, 0.10-0.20 for OBM)

Example: 5" drill pipe in horizontal section (I = 90°), tension T = 150,000 lbs, DLS = 1°/100ft, w_buoyed = 14 lbs/ft, mu = 0.25:
Fn_gravity = 14 x sin(90°) = 14 lbs/ft
Fn_tension = 150,000 x 1.0 x pi/(180 x 100) = 150,000 x 0.000175 = 26.2 lbs/ft
Fn = sqrt(14^2 + 26.2^2) = sqrt(196 + 686) = sqrt(882) = 29.7 lbs/ft contact force

Friction per foot = 0.25 x 29.7 = 7.4 lbs/ft
For 3,000 ft horizontal section: Total drag = 7.4 x 3,000 = 22,200 lbs drag in horizontal section alone

This drag must be overcome by applied surface weight during tripping in, or by drill string tension management during drilling.

Conclusion

The anti-collision calculation in this article - SF = 0.91 at 8,500 ft MD with 81.9 ft center-to-center separation against a combined uncertainty ellipsoid of 90 ft - demonstrates that wellbore collision risk is not a theoretical concern but a quantified engineering limit that requires immediate operational response. The directional driller who continues drilling when SF falls below 1.0 is gambling that the survey error is always in the safe direction. Survey errors are equally likely in all directions within the ellipsoid. At SF = 0.91, there is a non-trivial probability that the actual wellbore position of Well A is exactly where Well B is. Stopping and running a gyroscopic survey to reduce the uncertainty ellipsoid from 45 ft to 10 ft raises the SF from 0.91 to 81.9/20 = 4.1 - safely above the 1.5 threshold - and costs one day of rig time versus the cost of intersecting an adjacent producer.

The trajectory design calculation that reveals the 2°/100ft build rate sends the wellbore 3,973 ft horizontally during the build phase alone - already beyond the 3,200 ft target departure - shows why directional planning requires full trajectory simulation before spud. The instinct to use a gentle build rate for smoother wellbore geometry produces a trajectory that overshoots the target because horizontal departure accumulates through the entire build arc, not just in the hold section. The 3°/100ft redesign correctly balances build arc departure (2,649 ft) against hold section departure (551 ft) to reach exactly 3,200 ft total at the planned target depth.

Want to access our directional well planning calculator with minimum curvature survey calculation, DLS check, anti-collision SF, and torque and drag model, or discuss trajectory design for a specific directional well? Join our Telegram group for directional drilling discussions, or visit our YouTube channel for step-by-step tutorials on directional well planning and survey calculations.